Search for: "Perez v. Department of Corrections" Results 61 - 80 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2012, 8:27 am by Susan Brenner
  (Springfield is in Clark County, Ohio.)The Clark County Sheriff's Department found the car in a ditch a short distance from the mall, recovered the stolen clothing and began searching for the women. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
In applying the OML, the courts construe its provisions liberally in accordance with its stated purposes (see Perez, 5 NY3d at 528; Gordon v Village of Monticello, 87 NY2d 124, 127 [1995]; Encore Coll. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:23 am by Alex Vitrak
On May 1, Assistant Attorney General Tom Perez sent a letter to Alabama’s education department detailing the damage done by the law. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am by Ken
Sarmiento-Perez, 724 F.2d 898, 900 (11th Cir. 1984). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
New York State Department of Corrections, a summary order decided on January 13. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:40 pm by Law Lady
MARGARITA PEREZ, Appellee. 2nd District.Criminal law -- Probation revocation -- Discrepancy between oral pronouncement and written sentence -- Remanded with directions to correct written order to conform to oral pronouncementJEFFREY W. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 10:34 pm by David Jacobson
Ms Perez, one of Optus’ corporate counsel, explained in evidence what happened once advertising copy arrived in the department. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
(c) Although the Federal Circuit's test departs from the proper willful blindness standard in important respects, the evidence when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict for SEB was sufficient under the correct standard. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm by Aaron
Miles with the Securities Division of the Department of Financial Institutions was suppressible. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
New York State Department of Correctional Services, 2010 U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
Reference to the plain language of the statute does not clearly indicate which reading is correct. [read post]