Search for: "Perez v. Federal National" Results 61 - 80 of 294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2018, 9:55 am by Joy Waltemath
In granting the preliminary injunction that it later made permanent, the court, in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Perez, in which the court on Monday largely upheld Texas’ federal congressional and state legislative maps against a racial-gerrymandering challenge. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Perez, the court, by a vote of 5-4, largely upheld Texas’ federal congressional and state legislative maps against a racial-gerrymandering challenge. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
Perez, a racial-gerrymandering case from Texas (and a companion case with the same caption). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At The National Law Review, Kim Rinehart and others discuss Lozman v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” Subscript offers a graphic explainer for Sveen v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
Perez, two complex redistricting cases from Texas, and Animal Science Products v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm by Aurora Barnes
§ 16(b), as incorporated into the Immigration and Nationality Act’s provisions governing an alien’s removal from the United States, is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
PNC Bank National Association v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At Arbitration Nation, Liz Kramer observes that when the court rules in the third new case, Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
§ 16(b), as incorporated into the Immigration and Nationality Act’s provisions governing an alien’s removal from the United States, is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm by Aurora Barnes
§ 16(b), as incorporated into the Immigration and Nationality Act’s provisions governing an alien’s removal from the United States, is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:15 pm by Andrew Hamm
Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am by Anthony Gaughan
Wuerth notes that in the 2015 case of Sachs v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
Perez, two complex redistricting cases from Texas that are consolidated for an hour of argument. [read post]