Search for: "Perez v. State of Me."
Results 61 - 80
of 159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2022, 5:57 am
Plaintiff is a Black lawyer who worked for a state agency. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:28 am
Perez, 484 F.3d 735 (2007). [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:52 am
Let me talk about a different matter today. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:34 pm
On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 12:37 pm
The State does not argue harmless error but commendably acknowledges that Perez's probable testimony would have been important to the defendant's case. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
Indeed, in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 4:40 pm
Gonzales and Toledo-Flores v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 9:08 am
Perez v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 8:06 am
Perez, by the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:23 pm
Related Posts: Taxing Eggs: A Mini-Symposium Taxing Eggs: Introduction to Perez v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:13 am
In my view, these statutory provisions do not establish a basis for an order displacing the usual rule… [44] While the Court of Appeal in Perez v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 7:38 am
Perez, 531 So.2d 961 (Fla. 1988); State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 7:38 am
Perez, 531 So.2d 961 (Fla. 1988); State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm
Consider the recent case of Hurst v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 10:22 am
” In fact, the court’s use of the word “yet” seemed generous, as only one jurisdiction has adopted this exception, and since then no other state has followed: [S]ince the direct-to-consumer exception was created in New Jersey in Perez v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
It makes me wonder whether the hot streaks were caused by some particular individual pushing for certifications with a cold streak following when that individual PCSed or retired. [read post]
17 May 2018, 5:58 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:41 am
” (Gorsuch was referring to United States v. [read post]
