Search for: "Perez v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 713
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 3:34 am
Franklin also owns several firearms, which the Government contends “have long been recognized as being ‘tools of the drug trade.'” [Doc. 87 at 6 n.2 (quoting in part United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm
”) Normally does not mean always.[1] See Normally, Cambridge Dictionary (2019), https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dict ionary/english/normally (defining “normally” as “usually or regularly” and “usually, or in most cases” (emphasis added)); see also United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 10:38 am
Volume 135, issue 4 of the Harvard Law Review has two comments that may be of interest to blog readers: United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 11:18 am
U.S. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 11:30 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am
The court found that Michael's opinion was contradicted by decedent's medical records and the testimony of her physician, who stated that decedent was in full control of her faculties during an examination on the day that she executed the 2015 Will. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
End Citizens United had alleged Scott and the New Republican PAC, a group he formerly chaired, violated election laws prohibiting coordination between candidates and outside groups. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:07 am
Comments by Francisco Proenza, William Messina, and Jorge Perez-Lopez. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
The Court of Appeals sidesteps that argument and finds the statute that defendant was convicted under is constitutional.The case is United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:33 am
On Thursday, a Second Circuit panel declined to resolve this issue in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Compared to the rest of the world, the United States does not have a unique problem with tax evasion. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 7:06 pm
In 2017, even as the United States retreated from direct economic connections with Cuba, the European Union sought to step into the space left by the American action. [read post]
8 May 2021, 4:50 am
United StatesSouth Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 1:02 pm
App’x at 642 (quoting United States v. [read post]