Search for: "Perrin v. Perrin" Results 61 - 80 of 114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2011, 1:51 pm by S2KM Limited
Towers Perrin discontinued this portion of its analysis in 2002. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:13 am by sally
Supreme Court The Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54 (08 December 2010) Progress Property Company Ltd v Moorgarth Group Ltd [2010] UKSC 55 (08 December 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) A v B & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1378 (08 December 2010) Perrins v Holland & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1398 (08 December 2010) Tilianu, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions… [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
I am pleased to present below an article submitted by John Iole, a partner in the Insurance Recovery Practice of the Jones Day law firm. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:09 am by sally
In re Perrins, deceased; Perrins v Holland and others [2010] EWCA Civ 840; [2010] WLR (D) 196 “In a case where a testator had testamentary capacity when he gave instructions for his will, the will as drafted embodied those instructions and when the testator executed his will a year later his testamentary wishes remained unchanged although he was no longer of full testamentary capacity, the principle in Parker v Felgate (1883) LR 8 PD 171, namely that it was… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 3:46 am by traceydennis
In re Perrins, deceased; Perrins v Holland and others [2010] EWCA Civ 840; [2010] WLR (D) 196  ”In a case where a testator had testamentary capacity when he gave instructions for his will, the will as drafted embodied those instructions and when the testator executed his will a year later his testamentary wishes remained unchanged although he was no longer of full testamentary capacity, the principle in Parker v Felgate (1883) LR 8 PD 171, namely that… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
In patent law, as in all statutory construction, "[u]nless otherwise defined, 'words will be interpreted as taking their ordinary, contemporary, common meaning.'" Diehr, supra, at 182 (quoting Perrin v. [read post]