Search for: "Perry v. Clarke" Results 61 - 80 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2010, 4:45 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Law firm consultant Cordell Parvin on his Law Consulting Blog Sale of Hancock Tower Completes Distressed Debt Turnaround - Boston attorney Matthew Clark of Dechert on the firm's blog, Crunched Credit Croft v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:28 pm
Typical late spring Kat waiting to catch...some sunBook Review: Russell-Clarke and Howe on Industrial Designs The 9thedition of the go-to practitioner's text for design law in the UK is out. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
I Unjustified Threats Bill receives royal assent I"Socialistic brand": a unique category of vintage brand I Movement afoot in the patent scene in Argentina I‘Right to be forgotten’ may potentially apply to all top-level domains, says Swedish Data Protection Authority I A General Civil Restraint Order against issuing further IP claims - Is this the end of the Perry v Brundle saga? [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:33 pm
|Fordham 25|Unwired Planet v Huawei: Is FRAND now a competition law free zone? [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
  Never Too Late 67  [week ending on Sunday 11 October] – Eponia rumours | Batmobile and copyright | EPO and human rights | Gucci v Guess | NOCN (Formerly National Open College Network) v Open College Network Credit4Learning | New CJEU reference on linking and copyright | Viennese waltz may be the last dance for Board members | Richard Perry v F H Brundle & Others | Safe harbour and the Schrems… [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Removing State Constitution Badges of Inferiority, 22 Lewis & Clark Law Review 1151-1198 (2018).Patrick J. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, No. 14-10337 MobileMedia Ideas LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 2:33 am
”, Guest Kat Stephen Jones shares his insights on Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:50 am
Clarke County Bd. of Educ., 857 F. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
  Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]