Search for: "Person v. Commissioner of Correction" Results 61 - 80 of 847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2010, 3:21 am
Rescinding a tenure appointmentShaffer v Schenectady City School Dist., USCA2, LEXIS 20463If an appointing authority claims that it made a mistake in taking or confirming a personnel action, may it rescind the action or correct the error if the individual voices an objection? [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 5:11 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner). [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:55 am by privacylawyer
For example, the provision that the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Spencer said was meaningless is essentially reproduced in full. 44 An organization may disclose an individual’s person [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:08 pm by David Cross and Nazreen Ali
” In coming to this view, Bromberg J considered, but ultimately decided not to follow, a number of earlier decisions of the High Court and the NSW Court of Appeal  (Neale v Atlas Products (Victoria) Pty Ltd (1955) 94 CLR 419; World Book (Australia) Pty Ltd v Commission of Taxation (1992) 27 NSWLR 377; Vabu Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 81 IR 150)) which dealt with the meaning of “contract that is wholly or principally for the… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:21 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
On 23 November 2011, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Sugar v BBC [2010] EWCA Civ 715, a long-standing and well-publicised dispute stemming from a freedom of information request made of the BBC in January 2005. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 9:44 am by Ellie Ismaili, Olswang LLP
Background This case concerns the alleged maladministration of a GP’s practice in Northern Ireland and its implications on the correct interpretation of the powers of Northern Ireland’s Commissioner of Complaints. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:17 pm by Mark Summerfield
In a decision handed down on 13 April 2022, a panel of five judges of the Federal Court of Australia (‘Full Court’) overturned last year’s controversial ruling by Justice Jonathan Beach, determining that the (alleged) ‘AI inventor’ DABUS cannot be named as an inventor for the purposes of applying for a patent in Australia, and that the law requires the inventor to be a natural person or persons: Commissioner of Patents v Thaler [2022]… [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 3:13 am by Matrix Law
However, paragraph 1 of Schedule 10 to VATA gives a taxable person an option to tax transactions relating to a particular parcel of land. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:51 am by Dr Mark Summerfield
  Section 36 provides for the Commissioner to make determinations regarding the correct ‘eligible persons’ on a patent application, i.e. the persons (natural or corporate) entitled by invention, assignment or other transfer of title, to be the owner of any patent ultimately granted. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
An excerpt: The respondent, Troy Reid ..., an adult male, was committed to the custody of the Commissioner of Correction in 1995 to serve a forty year sentence. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:09 am by TJ McIntyre
In the circumstances, I am satisfied that the source code is exempt under section 26(1)(b) as well as section 27(1)(a) of the FOI Act.While this may be the correct result in the context of FOI, when taken together with the decision in DPP v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:52 am by Steven M. Gursten
Personal injury attorney exposes insurance companies threats and scare tactics - and huge profits - following McCormick v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm by NL
The statement must be made by or on behalf of the minister or other person who is the promoter of the bill. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
He claimed it was in retaliation for a prior lawsuit he filed against the Commissioner of the Department of Corrections. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:14 am by Matrix Law
Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (“”HMRC“) found that News Corp was not entitled to supply these digital editions at zero-rate VAT. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[The Commissioner adopted the ALJ's findings and recommendation.] * In Kelly v Levin, 81 A.D.2d 1005, the Appellate Division held if a jury finds a person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, or the charged individual enters a plea of guilty, a disciplinary hearing officer need hear no other evidence to render a verdict of guilty regarding a parallel charge in an administrative disciplinary proceeding brought against that individual. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[The Commissioner adopted the ALJ's findings and recommendation.] * In Kelly v Levin, 81 A.D.2d 1005, the Appellate Division held if a jury finds a person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, or the charged individual enters a plea of guilty, a disciplinary hearing officer need hear no other evidence to render a verdict of guilty regarding a parallel charge in an administrative disciplinary proceeding brought against that individual. [read post]