Search for: "Persons v. Jones"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,876
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[3] These two strands—the refusal to settle with persons who deny the allegations and the belief that refusing to admit is a denial—converge in the requirement that to settle with the Commission, a person must either (1) admit the allegations underlying the Commission’s enforcement action or (2) state that she neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am
Personal Information is Property, Jim Harper, American Enterprise Institute The Nominalism of the New Nominate Torts, Supreme Court Law Review, 2nd Series, 2024, Kerry Sun and Stéphane Sérafin, Univer [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:46 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:43 am
Jones, the court evaluated the “purposeful availment” aspect of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
Reserved Judgments Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Shafi v New Vision TV Limited and another, heard 4 December 2023 (Johnson J) Wilson v Mendelsohn [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
McLaughlin v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:16 am
In this post, Jaspal Pachu, Graham Muir and Jasleen Kaur at CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Vermilion Holdings Ltd [2023] UKSC 37, which was handed down on 25 October 2023. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am
On 8 January 2024, the High Court of Northern Ireland handed down judgment in the case of Kelly v O’Doherty [2024] NIMaster 1 [pdf]. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
” IPSO 20214-23 Lunn v The Jewish Chronicle, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach: sanction – publication of correction 20293-23 Mendes v Western Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 20606-23 White v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Statements in open court and apologies We are not aware of any statements in open court or apologies in the last week. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Jones, concurring: But we were wrong! [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 9:42 am
Philip Jones, Ecclesiastical Law: Vicarious Liability for Vicars: The Case of Holcombe Rogus. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
The CJEU held that MDK could rely on the exception at Article 9.2(h) of the GDPR to process the employee’s sensitive personal data. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:21 am
Financial situations unique to each case can shift outcomes as in Jones v Jones (2011), where the husband’s pre-marriage wealth significantly influenced the division of assets. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
Jones, No. 1:11-cv-0718, 2013 WL 1164929, at *6 (E.D. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:25 am
That doesn’t mean Casey Jones is. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
From Luo v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:15 am
I thought we might talk a little bit about what is probably the leading case on dress codes, Jespersen v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On 13 December 2023, there was a hearing of an application for strike out in the data protection case of Pacini v Dow Jones before HHJ Parkes KC. [read post]
