Search for: "Peters, Appeal of" Results 61 - 80 of 6,717
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Green Patents Program, in its turn, can be required at any time during the prosecution of a patent application, including during the appeal stage. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 7:22 am by Mavrick Law Firm
”  The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Beatrice Yahia
Peter Baker reports for the New York Times. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Jim Sedor
Appeals Court Sides with Judge Who Threatened Peter Navarro with Contempt MSN – Rachel Weiner (Washington Post) | Published: 4/1/2024 A federal appeals court rejected arguments from former Trump adviser Peter Navarro, one of a series of legal losses that has the economist facing sanction for defying court orders even as he serves a four-month prison sentence for ignoring similar demands from Congress. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm by Stephen Halbrook
  Opening for the appellants, Peter Patterson was immediately bombarded by the phrases "M-16s and the like" and "weapons of war," and the assertion that "the AR-15 is the M-16. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm by admin
In Daubert, the Supreme Court decided a legal question about the proper interpretation of a statute, Rule 702, and then remanded the case to the Ninth Circuit of the Court of Appeals for further proceedings. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 11:17 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
In July 1999, Democratic Governor Gray Davis reached an agreement with leaders of pro-immigrant organizations and his lawyers and gave up appealing the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that had declared it unconstitutional. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
To the best of my knowledge, this is the first appeal against a UPC seizure order, which enables me to raise this type of appeal before the new court. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Elections Georgia: “Georgia Lawmakers Approve New Election Rules That Could Impact 2024 Presidential Contest” by Sudhin Thanawala and Jeff Amy (Associated Press) for Yahoo News Ethics National: “Appeals Court Sides with Judge Who Threatened Peter Navarro with Contempt” by Rachel Weiner (Washington Post) for MSN Kentucky: “Louisville Mayor’s Wife Repeatedly Turned to City Worker for Social Media Help, Texts… [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:52 am by Dennis Crouch
Peter Menell’s Patent Case Management Judicial Guide published by the Federal Judicial Center includes a set of model jury instructions related to obviousness. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am by admin
See, e.g., Kenneth Chesebro, “Galileo’s Retort: Peter Huber’s Junk Scholarship,” 42 Am. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
On 12 June 2024, UCL will host a lecture delivered by Peter Meier-Beck (retired Presiding Judge of the German Federal Supreme Court) and reflecting on the first lessons to be learned from the UPC Court of Appeal. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 5:53 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
Law Offices of Peter Sverd, PLLC, 2024 NY Slip Op 30413 (NY Supreme Court 2024), the plaintiff sued her lawyer for malpractice arising out of an appeal of a discrimination lawsuit. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:52 pm by Howard Bashman
“Civil Rights Appeal Dismissed for Citing ‘Fabricated Cases’”: Peter Hayes of Bloomberg Law has this report (subscription required for full access) on a decision that the U.S. [read post]