Search for: "Petit v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y."
Results 61 - 80
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" Supreme Court granted Atkinson's petition and the appointing authority appealed. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Supreme Court granted Atkinson's petition and the appointing authority appealed. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Supreme Court granted Atkinson's petition and the appointing authority appealed. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" Supreme Court granted Atkinson's petition and the appointing authority appealed. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Supreme Court granted Atkinson's petition and the appointing authority appealed. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Supreme Court granted Atkinson's petition and the appointing authority appealed. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Ultimately the Court of Appeals considered the matter in terms of a court's authority to overturn or modify an administrative disciplinary decision or a disciplinary penalty imposed on a worker [Kelly v Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32].The Court of Appeals, ruled:1. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
The decision by the Court of Appeals in Professional, Clerical, Technical Employees Association v Buffalo Board of Education [2 Rulings, #64 and #65], 90 N.Y.2d 364, provides some important insights as to the application of this concept.The Association case arose when the Buffalo City School District "passed over" Melvin Cross, the highest-scoring candidate on a promotion examination eligible list for Associate Account Clerk and appointed three lower… [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Many states allow for such a change to occur with ease on the marriage license, but New York did not.Laws of 2019, Ch 712 enacted and effective on December 20, 2019, amended Domestic Relations Law §11-a, subd. 1 a to allow the New York City clerk to designate additional staff members as he or she deems necessary to officiate marriages.Laws of 2019, Ch 663, enacted on December 12, 2019, effective 90 days after it becomes a law, amended Family Court Act § 812, subd. 5, and Criminal… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
Boden, 42 N.Y.2d 210, 212). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Respondents answered, opposing the petition. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Respondents answered, opposing the petition. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
Petitioner brings this Article 78 proceeding to overturn respondent’s denial of petitioner’s application to return to the paraprofessional position he previously held at New York City Department of Education (DOE). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Such hearing shall only be held if:(i) the person is related to the child as described under paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of subdivision three of section four hundred fifty-eight-a of the social services law;(ii) the child has been temporarily removed under this part, or placed pursuant to section one thousand fifty-five of this article, and placed in non-relative foster care;(iii) the relative indicates a willingness to become the foster parent for such child and has not refused previously to be… [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 7:47 am
In a 1977 case called Abood v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
Silber, 99 N.Y.2d 395, 404,cert denied 540 U.S. 817). [read post]
