Search for: "Philip v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,309
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2023, 4:54 am
Cos. v Carbone, 85 AD3d 1110, 1111 [2d Dept 2011]. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:03 pm
For example, in the 1914 case Harris v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 2:22 pm
New Article: Philip S. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
State laboratories can send STEC cultures to the CDC to determine the serotype. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
That argument had also been made by Xiaomi in the dispute with Philips. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
Alexis de Tocqueville, Of the Use Which Americans Make of Public Associations and Civic Life, Section 2, Chapter V in Democracy in America, Volume II (1840). [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
The complaints relate to: Two editions of Friday Morning with Esther and Phil (presented by husband and wife Conservative MPs Esther McVey and Philip Davies); “State of the Nation”, a programme presented by another Tory MP, Jacob Rees-Mogg; and an episode of the Laurence Fox show which was guest presented by Martin Daubney. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
The United States represents every citizen, so “everybody” is literally true. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:57 am
” Watson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
How Jack Smith May Charge Trump PAC with Fraudulent Fundraising Within the Bounds of First Amendment
24 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
But in a case against Philip Morris (U.S. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Technological Platforms and National Security in Hong Kong: The Domain of Standards Setting (Law and Technology Center; Philip K.H. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:04 am
" Kendall v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 6:20 am
(ND 5/4/2023) – The case was reassigned to Judge Philip P. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:03 am
The conference was kicked off by a keynote speech by Justice Philip Jeyaretnam (Singapore International Commercial Court), providing an in-depth analysis of the Court of Appeal’s decision in Anupam Mittal v Westbridge Ventures II [2023] SGCA 1 (discussed in more detail here). [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156 considered the constitutionality of the prohibition under Queensland’s Weapons Act 1990 on bringing a kirpan into a school. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am
Philip Jones, Ecclesiastical Law: Safeguarding and the Rule of Law. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am
Appeal On appeal, Teva and Sandoz contended that the judge had erred in the application of the law as stated in Pozzoli[2] and Philips[3], in particular the premise that in order to be inventive the patent must solve the problem to which is it addressed. [read post]
