Search for: "Phillips v. Carter" Results 61 - 80 of 234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2015, 11:19 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
The case has strong advocates (Carter Phillips for Life Technologies and Seth Waxman for Promega), and the petition is supported by amici Agilent Technologies and Professor Tim Holbrook, and by a dissent below from Chief Judge Prost.There are two petitions related to whether the recent Supreme Court § 285 decisions (Octane Fitness and Highmark) also changed the standard for willful infringement under § 284: Halo v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:40 am
  She begins her opinion, as judges usually do, explaining how the lawsuit arose and what it involved:Plaintiffs Phillip Beverly and Robert Bionaz are two professors at Chicago State University (`CSU’). [read post]
13 May 2015, 3:00 pm
Thomas Goldstein (Goldstein Russell) represented Don Quixote; Carter Phillips (Sidley Austin) argued for the interests of the Family Court of La Mancha and Don Quixote's niece Antonia, who wished to be named his guardian.The parties advocated for and against the competency of one Don Quixote de la Mancha. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am by Kali Borkoski
” Justice Garland recalled the Court’s precedent in “NBC v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:02 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Carter Phillips is listed as Counsel for the Family Court. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 2:23 pm
As I noted in that earlier post, "[v]eteran appellate advocate Carter G. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
(a)  Hodge Jones & Allen LLP v Times Newspapers Ltd (b)  Brand v NGN (c)  Walliams v NGN. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:51 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
This morning I attended the Supreme Court argument in Teva v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
Carter Phillips of Sidley argued for Sandoz and Ginger Anders represented the Solicitor’s Office as Amicus. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
Carter Phillips of Sidley argued for Sandoz and Ginger Anders represented the Solicitor’s Office as Amicus. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:45 am
"Jeremy Phillips - shaking up the IP world with sharp analysis and  casual humor since 1973Our dear blogmeister Jeremy Phillips came to podium with 41 years of experience in IP in his belt and introducing "Phillips's Three Rules of Change". 1. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:41 pm by Ronald Mann
The biggest problem with Alice’s case (presented by Carter Phillips) is its similarity to Bilski v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:53 am by Ronald Mann
(represented by Carter Phillips), because the Justices all agreed in Bilski that there is a category of idea that is so abstract that a patent claiming the idea cannot issue. [read post]