Search for: "Pigeon v. Pigeon"
Results 61 - 80
of 150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2014, 10:33 am
In Arden v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 1:06 pm
In a decision dated February 12th 2014, the Supreme Court of Ontario upheld this verdict citing a 2009 case Royal Bank v McPherson. [read post]
Sixth Circuit Rejects EEOC’s Expert Evidence In Proposed Pattern Or Practice Class Action Litigation
14 Apr 2014, 6:18 am
The EEOC learns what it’s like to be the statue and not the pigeon. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 2:04 am
Batley Pet Products Ltd v North Lanarkshire Council, which could have been avoided by simple communication between the parties – by carrier pigeon, say – and is disappointingly about dilapidations, not pets. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:54 am
There have been instances when highly creative unconventional works, such as the assembly of a scene or a Stormtrooper helmet, were not found eligible for copyright protection because they could not be pigeon-holed within any of the eight categories of works that UK law protects.Having said this, it would now seem that compliance with EU law requires adoption of open-ended subject-matter categorisations, as is already the case under, say, French, German and Italian laws. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 9:42 pm
For once, there are no jokes about Bird & Bird, but the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Jack Wills Ltd v House of Fraser (Stores) Ltd [2014] EWHC 110 (Ch) was handed down last Friday (31 January 2014) by Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 4:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 10:58 am
Part Four: User Generated Content (Content Treasure Trove v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 4:25 am
The court begins the opinion by explaining that “Kenneth Seaton [who brought the lawsuit] is the sole proprietor of Grand Resort Hotel and Convention Center (`Grand Resort’) located in Pigeon Forge, Tennessee. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:20 am
Lyons v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:00 pm
If Edward Snowden has singlehandedly reduced international terrorists to communicating by carrier pigeon and smoke signal, he should be given a medal. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 1:23 pm
In People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 6:10 pm
In Matter of LaRusso v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 4:40 pm
Patriquin, supra; Anderson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 12:15 pm
The DMLP submitted an amicus curiae brief (pdf) last week to the Sixth Circuit in the case of Seaton v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am
He lamented the uncertainty created by the US Supreme Court's odd ruling in US v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:27 am
Bimberg v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:02 am
Such cases include ICU Medical v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
And now, here is a legal first, straight from the pen (well, keyboard) of our Mr Justice Arnold in joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA)/Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) on whether the English Courts have jurisdiction over issues of infringement of foreign-designated patents. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 6:43 am
Canadian Indemnity Co v. [read post]
