Search for: "Pitman v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2010, 9:54 pm
” • Referring to this judgment Longmore LJ, in Summit Property Ltd v Pitmans (A Firm) [2001] EWCA Civ 2020, at paragraph 16, approved this view and went further: “In my judgment, it is also no longer necessary for a party to have acted unreasonably or improperly before he can be required to pay the costs of the other party of a particular issue on which he (the first party) has failed. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:57 am
Pitman v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:28 pm
A. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am
See Mazzola v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 3:22 am
” Texas v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:06 pm
The Austin-based federal Western District Court for Texas found the United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:19 am
Cisneros, decided March 23 by Judge Robert Pitman (W.D. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 3:49 pm
From today's decision by Judge Robert Pitman (W.D. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 11:57 am
Yet, in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:28 am
The court also granted class certification, for settlement purposes; approved a proposed notice to class members; and signed off on plaintiffs’ firm Outten & Golden as class counsel (Ballinger v Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc, dba Condé Nast Publications, December 29, 2014, Pitman, H). [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 12:01 pm
From Van Loon v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 8:47 am
Judge Graves wrote the majority opinion in Campaign for Southern Equality v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
UN member states asked the UK about ‘super-injunctions’, online freedom of expression and the defamation bill: “The UK’s representative at the review, Lord McNally, responded to the questions and recommendations regarding defamation and its impact on freedom of expression by stating that ‘his baby’ aimed to get the balance right between a free media and the right of the individual to privacy, and that it was regarded as a ‘good law’… [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:03 pm
See Sorrell v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
The Omnipresent State Sector 552 2. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
” That characterization ignored the ruling’s profound real-world effect, preventing 85%-90% of women from exercising their rights under Roe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
I asked a judge in Beijing (my wife assisting as interpreter) his views of the judiciary’s state of independence. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term
Commencing March 4, 1877
1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm
The ability of newspapers generally and, in particular, the defendant’s publications, to summarise to the Judge’s satisfaction the burden and content of his earlier decision on 11 February 2021 in Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers [2021] EWHC 273 (Ch), evidently irked him. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
[See pp. 165-204, on Vásquez.] [read post]
