Search for: "Plante v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2013, 11:00 am
S. 617, 625, and confers on the purchaser, or any subsequent owner, “the right to use [or] sell” the thing as he sees fit, United States v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:25 pm
United States Forest Service, 469 F.3d 768, 772 (9th Cir. 2006) (Pit River I). [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:50 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 10:51 am
On July 23, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that the U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:28 pm
he United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") justifies the Plant Protection Act ("PPA")(7 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:27 pm
he United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") justifies the Plant Protection Act ("PPA")(7 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 1:29 pm
Appealed from the June 27, 2012 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
State regulators and plant operators have additional compliance options to meet the emission limits. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
United States, which begins: The owners of a Sudanese pharmaceutical plant sued the United States for unjustifiably destroying the plant, failing to compensate them for its destruction, and defaming them by asserting they had ties to Osama bin Laden. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 7:03 pm
" Kelley v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 7:03 pm
" Kelley v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:45 am
United States Federal Circuit, Case No.13-5059. [read post]
8 May 2020, 9:00 am
United States, No. 19-1165, slip op. (3d Cir. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 2:51 am
A lawsuit recently filed against the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) asserts that the USDA must consider the cumulative effects of CO2 emissions from multiple coal-fired electrical generating facilities before it can provide funding for new coal-fired plant.In Montana Environmental Information Center, et al. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 9:13 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 9:44 am
According DHS, the "worksite enforcement action" was in response to an ICE investigation that revealed that a large number of workers at Swift's Greeley, Colorado compound were in the United States illegally and had obtained employment by stealing the identities of United States citizens and lawful permanent residents. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 7:22 am
See KSR Int'l v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:41 am
’ See also United States v. [read post]
