Search for: "Powers v. Arizona Department of Corrections" Results 61 - 80 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2019, 9:58 am by Amy Howe
The government recommended a grant in Thole v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
BlagojevichCourt: U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-3075 Opinion Date: August 25, 2011 Judge: MANION Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Government & Administrative Law Inmates sued (officials in the Illinois Department of Corrections for marking up the price of commissary goods beyond the statutory cap (730 ILCS 5/3-7-2a). [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
[A reply to Professor Andrew Koppelman] In the Arizona Law Review, Professor Andrew Koppelman asks the provocative question Why Do (Some) Originalists Hate America? [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm by cdw
  For those who normally don’t skim down to the bottom of the post, the “other” list this week has a notable case on habeas powers, Gall v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
”More than fifty years ago, in Miranda v Arizona, the US Supreme Court warned about the dangers inherent in private settings and circumstances which allow state officials to subjugate and intimidate people. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
The court denied the Justice Department’s petition for certiorari before judgment in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am by Ryan Goodman
That statute, 18 U.S.C. section 241, should not have been a surprise: it is a powerful and oft-used tool by prosecutors. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Warby LJ, with whom Sharp P and Singh LJ agreed, held that Steyn J had been correct in principle to reconsider the issue of serious harm in relation to the period after Ms Cadwalladr’s public interest defence fell away. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
LEXIS 34 (Ala Crim App 4/30/2010) On return from remand and technical correction of sentencing order, death sentence affirmed. [read post]