Search for: "Powers v. Commissioner" Results 61 - 80 of 2,604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am by Aidan Wills, Matrix
The Justices considered two previous judgments in which it/the House of Lords has held suspicionless stop and search powers to comply with article 8 (R (Gillan) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2006] UKHL 12; Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions [2015] UKSC 49) and the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) decision in Gillan v UK (2010) application no. 4158/05, in which it held that the suspicionless search power under… [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm by Graham Smith
 Limits on powers v safeguards The Act is underpinned by the assumption that breadth of powers can be counterbalanced by safeguards (independent prior approval, access restrictions, oversight) and soft limits on their exercise (necessity and proportionality). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm by Graham Smith
Judicial approvalOn the swan side warrants for interception and equipment interference, together with most types of power exercisable by notice, will be subject to prior approval by independent Judicial Commissioners. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:00 am by Kyle Krull
Commissioner affirms and simplifies a very powerful tool for passing on wealth, especially for the business owner. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:00 am by Paul Caron
Commissioner [501 U.S. 868 (1991)] and the majority's holding that... [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:07 am by Andrew Wheelhouse, OXHRH
Such a matter was recently considered by the UK Supreme Court in R (Catt and T) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2015] UKSC 9. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:48 am by INFORRM
Indeed I argued exactly that in a submission to the Investigatory Powers Commissioner. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:00 am by ernst
The chapter examines the extent to which the influence of Dixon J, together with the nature of the very issues considered in these cases, come together to influence the outcome of what is often regarded as the most seminal case on executive power in recent years: Pape v Commissioner of Taxation. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:45 am by CMS
On Tuesday 20 and Wednesday 21 February 2018, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal of Prudential Assurance Company Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC and the outcome is awaited. [read post]
Since the FTC wields this executive power—that which is constitutionally vested solely with the president—the FTC commissioners must be subject to presidential removal. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:09 am by John Jascob
If the CFTC’s writ of mandamus was issued, a contempt hearing in the district court requiring the attendance and sworn testimony of three commissioners would be barred, and the case might be reassigned from Judge Robert Blakey to a different district court judge (CFTC v. [read post]