Search for: "Powers v. U.s.*"
Results 61 - 80
of 5,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 8:30 am
Next term the Supreme Court will hear argument in CFPB v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:20 pm
Oxford Health Plans, LLC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:12 am
Champion famously held that Congress had the power to ban the sale of lottery tickets across state lines under the Commerce power. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am
In Anderson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
Alabama Power Co., 483 F.3d 1184 (11th Cir. 2007). [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am
Baker, 444 Mass. 487, 491 (2005), quoting Powers v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
In Lowery v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
Metcalf v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
This case is Kelly-Brown v Winfrey, No. 11 cv 7875 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 3:06 pm
” In Community Financial Services v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
But in Worthy v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:13 am
” A companion case, Henderson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm
Bus. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:32 pm
” La Buy v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:52 pm
As explained by the Appeals Court, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NiMo) commenced this action to recover costs pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) from the defendants for cleanup of properties previously owned by NiMo and once either owned, leased, or used by the defendants. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 1:53 pm
[Petition: Cooper v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 2:55 pm
Sandvig v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am
When the scope of the interstate commerce authority expanded during World War II, with the Supreme Court’s 1942 Wickard v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:21 pm
When discussing the Bush Administration's claim of unfettered Presidential power as Commander in Chief, "liberals" would cite the various opinions in Youngstown v. [read post]
