Search for: "Price et al v. Management " Results 61 - 80 of 446
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2015, 11:12 am by Lyle Denniston
Newman, et al., was sent to the Court just days before a filing deadline. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Counsel has an elevated duty to recommend, draft and implement robust compliance directives that lay the foundations on how to hold C-suite executives accountable for the management of information that is disseminated to participants in the market, particularly after the Supreme Court ruling in Lorenzo v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
  For those of you who haven't been following the story, here's a brief recap, shamelessly borrowing from William's prior posts: Jones, et al., were investors in mutual funds managed by Harris Associates, an investment adviser. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 7:26 am by Tim Banks @TM_Banks
The Supreme Court of Canada has just released the much anticipated decision in Information and Privacy Commissioner, et al. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:20 am by Matthias Weller
On 10 July 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rendered its judgment in the matter of Alan Philipps et al. v. the Federal Republic of Germany and the Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
On September 3, 2009, twenty-five corporate law and finance professors and scholars - including several contributors to this blog - filed an amici curiae brief in the case of Jones et al. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
The negative product impacts of PSCs contrast with the findings of other papers that traditional short selling can improve corporate performance through disciplining managers (e.g., Chang et al., 2019; Fang et al., 2016; He and Tian, 2016; Grullon et al., 2015; Massa et al., 2015). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
This post examines an issue that arose in the case of Music Group Macao Commercial Offshore Limited, et al. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 2:39 pm
In short, the court stated that Defendants were attempting to impose Revlon duties, as applied to Maryland law in Shenker v. [read post]