Search for: "Price v. Block"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2023, 4:26 pm
Contractors should track and document any changes in workload to ensure that any increases in scope and associated cost or price adjustments are appropriately reflected in a contract modification. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
For example, in DeHoog v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
There is no market price for water rights, which leads to the predictable shortages, rationing, and misallocation. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
—Confucius 1Port Murray Dairy Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:02 pm
The case can be contrasted with Silbersher v. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Fang, V. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 2:20 pm
Case Citation: Hicks v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Can pigeonhole locals/block them from opportunities. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
., a loss of labor market competition) could not be justified on the basis that it would substantially reduce output costs or prices.[8] Increasing Litigiousness The changes in the Merger Guidelines also reflect an increased interest among Agency le [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm
Instead, again, they cite to Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
In addition, the Judge noticed that the deal plan evaluation model presented to the Microsoft Board of Directors to justify the Activision purchase price (iv) relied on PlayStation sales and other non-Microsoft platforms post-acquisition, and (v) reflected access to mobile content as a critical factor in favor of the deal. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Health Ass’n v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Health Ass’n v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Health Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
On the cost side, the now-indispensable economics experts might charge, in a private case, millions and even tens of millions of dollars to define the relevant market, compute the “but for” price of the goods or services in question, prove the losses resulting from anticompetitive conduct, establish that common elements of proof will predominate over individual proof, and disprove the inevitable theoretical pro-competitive justifications for facially anticompetitive… [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:56 am
In Biden v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Canada Google has announced that it will block news links in Canada in response to the mandated payment for links approach established in Bill C-18. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Yesterday's closing argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
10th Circuit endorses presumption of Lanham Act false advertising injury in mostly two-player market
29 Jun 2023, 5:15 am
Vitamins Online, Inc. v. [read post]
