Search for: "Price v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 13,188
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2024, 3:38 pm by Stephanie Snyder-Zuasnabar
Olympus entered into a fixed price contract with the United States to pave the plant yards at the Stratford Army Engine Plant located in Strat­ford, Connecticut. [read post]
 The Act would create a presumption that a defendant entered into an agreement, contract, or conspiracy in restraint of trade in violation of the antitrust laws if the defendant: (i) distributed a pricing algorithm to two or more persons with the intent that the pricing algorithm be used to set or recommend a price or (ii) used a pricing algorithm to set or recommend a price or commercial term of a product or service and the pricing… [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm by Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
Yet, the EU standard for legal anonymisation is still hotly debated, as illustrated by the recent case of SRB v EDPS now under appeal before the Court of Justice. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:52 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
The Board of Appeal held that the claimed invention was novel and involved an inventive step.Trade MarksAlessandro Cerri reported on the highly anticipated judgment of the England & Wales Court of Appeal in Lidl v Tesco, which upheld the High Court's findings on bad faith, infringement, and passing off, including the findings in respect of the 'price-matching' allegation. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 1:35 pm by David Adelstein
An opinion out of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals – Williams Building Company, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:26 pm by Andrew Crocker
EFF signed on to an amicus brief drafted by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers earlier this month petitioning the Oregon Supreme Court to review State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:59 am by Unknown
Knowing that Brookfield expected to gain $130 million in management fees would have helped stockholders evaluate whether Brookfield paid a fair price and whether the special committee leveraged the added value.The case is No. 241, 2023. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
   How one state's 2008 law has effectively curbed how face recognition technology is used there, perhaps creating a model for other states or Congress to follow. [read post]