Search for: "Price v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2019, 1:30 am
The latest addition to this ill-fated family of cases is entitled Namerow v PediatriCare Associates, LLC, decided last November by a New Jersey Superior Court judge, in which the court enforced a fixed price buy-sell agreement among members of a medical practice where the original certificate of value hadn’t been updated for 16 years at the time of the plaintiff doctor’s retirement from the practice. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
On August 8, 2010, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s holding in Miller v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 11:44 am
App. 190 (1984) and Price v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:50 pm
The Court recognized in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 10:08 am
A judge who’s calling escalating prices on the court’s time has given the parties in a bankruptcy proceeding just two weeks to file a joint litigation plan after he took over aggressive management of the case.Ontario Superior Court Justice David Brown made the order in Atlas Holdings v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
The “price” of the books was twenty-five cents each, the “price” of the pamphlets five cents each. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Superior Court (1995) 10 Cal.4th 1185); sellers of used products (Wilkinson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm
That was the issue pending before the Illinois Supreme Court earlier this month in Price v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:26 am
Some courts hold that “bald assertions of price superiority constitute puffery if they are so sufficiently general that a consumer is unlikely to rely on the statement. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:44 am
Our friend and colleague Marius Adomnica (Gratl & Company) has written this good case note on the recent Tim Hortons class action case in Ontario: The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released its reasons striking the Plaintiffs’ claim in Fairview Donut Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
Superior Court,113 Cal.App.4th 195, 213, fn. 10 (2003). [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
TINA specifically prohibits a contractor from claiming the Government’s price would not have decreased because the procurement was sole source or the contractor otherwise had superior bargaining power.[16] A contractor also cannot claim the Contracting Officer should have known the data were defective even though the contractor took no affirmative action to inform the Contracting Officer the data were defective.[17] A contractor cannot claim the price would not… [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:28 am
In Werdebaugh v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:59 am
In addressing commonality, the court applied the recent decision in Wal-mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:47 am
Spann v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 3:04 pm
In C.R.T.R. v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:02 pm
After a bench trial, the lower court ruled for the defendants in Walid v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 4:06 am
In Price v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 4:06 am
In Price v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:53 am
Superior Court, and subsequently codified in AB 5) to differentiate between independent contractors and employees in the trucking industry. [read post]
