Search for: "Pro Se Services Inc"
Results 61 - 80
of 509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2022, 5:35 pm
George also suggests that the 9th Circuit’s rule has an “especially pernicious effect … on pro se litigants. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 9:11 am
First, this wasn’t a typical pro se suit; actual licensed lawyers were involved. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:41 am
Recognizing the year's worst in government transparency. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
Jan. 14, 2022) [Failure to effect service.]Brooke v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
In Simon & Schuster Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am
Public.Resource.Org, Inc. 2020) and a law introduced in 2019 in France which prohibits the publication of statistical analysis of court decisions (Légifrance 2019). [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 8:19 am
Pro Football, Inc., 518 U.S. 231 (1996); NYNEX Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am
Mindgeek USA Inc., 2021 WL 4167054 (C.D. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 9:05 am
Grisez, pro bono counsel at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP on behalf of the American Bar Association; Elizabeth J. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:52 am
Strickler Copyright Royalty Judge Steve Ruwe US Copyright Royalty Board 101 Independence Ave SE / P.O. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:59 am
Remember this as you prepare Thanksgiving for your family and as you read this post – it is Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) Mission Statement: Protecting the public’s health by ensuring the safety of meat, poultry, and processed egg products. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 10:33 am
Pro se litigants often claim that Internet services are state actors. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am
FHA Accommodation claims Pro se plaintiffs present both courts and landlords with difficult problems, as the decision in Negiendo v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:52 am
Sometimes it puts on its public safety hat, and sometimes — actually, most often — it puts on its pro-meat industry hat. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 5:06 pm
Sometimes it puts on its public safety hat, and sometimes — actually, most often — it puts on its pro-meat industry hat. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
Interestingly, the court didn’t hold that the registered LTTB marks were per se invalid—they could still be protectable if used on clothing tags. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 2:28 pm
Aya Healthcare Services, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
Twitter, Inc., 2021 WL 3675207 (N.D. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 6:12 pm
Although a lawyer had helped Cretacci to prepare the complaint, Cretacci had filed “pro se” (representing himself) because the lawyer was not a member of the relevant bar. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 6:31 am
To the extent courts have approved departures from the party presentation principle in criminal cases, the justification has usually been to protect a pro se litigant’s rights. [read post]
