Search for: "Progressive v. Estate"
Results 61 - 80
of 620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2010, 4:55 pm
Some Questions to Ask Yourself - Columbus lawyer Teri Rasmussen of Plunkett Cooney in her Ohio Practical Business Law Blog Willow Bend v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:30 am
Most of the western music tradition is built around the chord progression known as I – IV – V – I. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
In both cases, we held that the fees generated by one partner in completing the matters were to be shared equally with the former partner (or his estate). [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 2:41 pm
Progressive County Mutual Ins. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:45 am
California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Sackett v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:23 am
Estate of Phyllis Farissier v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
As she has done with past cases, Jill Browning provides the following same-day analysis of the Supreme Court oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
As she has done with past cases, Jill Browning provides the following same-day analysis of the Supreme Court oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:54 pm
The parties dispute whether the basic I - iii-IV- V chord progression used in LGO is common place, or was commonplace prior to LGO. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 9:37 am
The parties dispute whether the basic I - iii-IV- V chord progression used in LGO is common place, or was commonplace prior to LGO. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:52 am
The Fourth District Court of Appeal's decision in Saunders v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 10:36 am
Patrick v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:18 pm
” The Court ultimately denied Rajwani’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, holding that, based on the pleadings and papers filed in the Maryland Case, Payments IP made a prima facie showing of personal jurisdiction because: (i) over the course of seven years, Rajwani engaged in extensive negotiations with the B52 Parties (who were domiciled in Maryland) with respect to the Domain; (ii) Rajwani transferred money to B52 on four occasions, totaling… [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:55 am
Plaintiff acknowledges that he is not a client of and is not in privity with Defendants, but asserts that he may recover for losses arising from Defendants’ legal malpractice if the complaint alleges “fraud, collusion, malicious acts or other special circumstances” (Plaintiffs opposition at 25, citing, inter alia, Estate of Schneider v Finmann, 15 NY3d 306, 308 [2010]). [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
That wouldn't be unusual except that in Bagley v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
Here in Country Club Partners, LLC v Goldman ; 2010 NY Slip Op 09309 ; Decided on December 16, 2010 ; Appellate Division, Third Department we see an allegation of legal malpractice (not addressed here) and of breach of fiduciary duty in the real estate transactions surrounding a country club transaction. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:59 am
Thompson In Thompson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
February 19, 2014 - 2 PM: In re Drew Estate Holding Company LLC, Serial No. 77840485 [Section 2(e)(3) refusal to register KUBA KUBA BY DREW ESTATE on the ground that the mark is primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of "Cigars made with Cuban seed tobacco"] [Note that in In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate 97 USPQ2d 1640 (TTAB 2011) [precedential], the Board found the mark KUBA KUBA to be primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
