Search for: "Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. EPA"
Results 61 - 80
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Can provincial environmental ministries use their regulatory powers to force the funds of insolvent organizations to be spent on environmental cleanups, in priority to the claims of creditors, pensioners, employees, and others? [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm
NMA further contends EPA, in violation of administrative law requirements, has either not consulted with other agencies responsible for ensuring electricity reliability or, if it has done so, has not subjected those consultations to public scrutiny. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm
OIG indicates, "This review did not meet all OMB requirements for peer review of a highly influential scientific assessment primarily because the review results and EPA's response were not publicly reported, and because 1 of the 12 reviewers was an EPA employee. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
: 09-076/09-090/09-091 Superior Fine Papers Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 11:10 am
Title II, "Research and Development Directions", contains provisions directing the Secretaries of Energy, Homeland Security, Health and Human Services, and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), to establish grant programs for nanotechnology research "to address the need for "clean, cheap, renewable energy","sensors and other materials related to Homeland Security needs", "Health related applications of… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:20 pm
EPA, holding that the Clean Air Act covered carbon dioxide emissions and that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could therefore decide whether or not to regulate them. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:23 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:06 pm
Last year’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
This comprehensive bill is aimed at improving public safety on tribal lands. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:09 am
Environmental Protection Agency, reacting to a 2007 Supreme Court ruling finding that EPA did have authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, has begun a series of actions under the Act to start regulating such pollution. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
Click Here Tanco Kansas City to Pay $97,845 Civil Penalty for Violations of Clean Water Act, Failure to Prepare Facility Response Plan. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $132,000 penalty was ordered after inspectors found problems with the way Spirit transported waste, the way the company stored and disposed of hazardous waste and failing to provide documented hazardous waste training for employees. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here DECISIONS Opinion in Butte Environmental Council v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here DECISIONS Opinion in Butte Environmental Council v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The company also failed to implement spill response plans, document spills and properly train employees for handling the material. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Garland has spent most of his career in public service, much like Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
