Search for: "Public Service Company v. Brown"
Results 61 - 80
of 801
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2020, 9:46 am
See generally Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
S. 794 (1976); Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
The Catalog Is Out of the Bag Award: Special Services Group In response to a California Public Records Act request for information about surveillance technology, the Irvine Police Department in California provided researchers at MuckRock and Open the Government with a catalog called the “Black Book” from a secretive company called Special Services Group. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
The Catalog Is Out of the Bag Award: Special Services Group In response to a California Public Records Act request for information about surveillance technology, the Irvine Police Department in California provided researchers at MuckRock and Open the Government with a catalog called the “Black Book” from a secretive company called Special Services Group. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:51 am
Brown, et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Incompatibility of First Amendment defenses/theories between TM and right of publicity: 9th Circuit cases in which TM claims fail on First Amendment grounds, Brown v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
(Fidelity Creditor Service, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am
Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Limited, heard 22 November 2011. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
The following six appeals from Trinidad and Tobago will be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Dyson from Tuesday 17 May 2011 – Thursday 19 May 2011 in the Privy Council: Winston Gibson v Public Service Commission; Ranjan Rampersad v Commissioner of Police and Police Service Commission; Robert Ramsahai v Teaching Service Commission; Ashford Sankar & Others v Public Service… [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
Code § 3344) and common law (White v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
Code § 3344) and common law (White v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 8:48 am
The local waste management company would be liable for continuing to service the building in which MindGeek’s offices are located. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:42 am
Although intellectual property was originally meant to protect 'the labours of the mind, productions and interests as much a man's own, and as much the fruit of his honest industry, as the wheat he cultivates, or the flocks he rears' (Davoll v Brown, 1845), its use has recently shifted, from a primary force in company growth to a strategic asset frequently asserted for defensive purposes. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 8:51 am
Hershey Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am
We know bringing works to new audiences is commercially valuable by sheer fact that companies like Aereo expend capital doing just that. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Brown
• US v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 8:03 am
v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:00 am
Supreme Court issued a decision in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:18 am
Fish and Wildlife Service next term. [read post]
