Search for: "Public Utility Workers v. Public Service Co."
Results 61 - 80
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2018, 6:57 am
The European Journal of Public Health. 2015;26(2):354-359.[7] Subramaniyan R, Veliah G, Gopichandran V. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm
The FLSA and most other wage and hour laws generally rules presume that workers rendering services are common law employees of the business in most circumstances. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:32 am
See, e.g., Fres-co Systems USA, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:46 pm
TetraTech v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 6:30 am
As such, Humana utilizes a multi-faceted approach of member questionnaires, public records, such as accident reports and workers’ compensation claims, and non-public records, such as data relayed by CMS, to determine possible MSP coordination of benefits and reimbursement opportunities. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 6:30 am
As such, Humana utilizes a multi-faceted approach of member questionnaires, public records, such as accident reports and workers’ compensation claims, and non-public records, such as data relayed by CMS, to determine possible MSP coordination of benefits and reimbursement opportunities. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
There are also special regulations on background checks in the context of particular employment fields, such as health and dependent care, education, law enforcement or public utilities. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
There are also special regulations on background checks in the context of particular employment fields, such as health and dependent care, education, law enforcement or public utilities. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:27 am
There are also special regulations on background checks in the context of particular employment fields, such as health and dependent care, education, law enforcement or public utilities. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am
John Stark Reed Readers undoubtedly are aware of the recent outbreak of ransomware incidents and the problems they present. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:51 pm
Co., 179 F.3d 557, 560 (CA7 1999).532 U.S. at __ Justice Scalia’s dissent – addressing an issue not addressed by the majority therein and not dealt with by the Court to date – is notable because it employs the very same rationale as utilized in Fordand its brethren, including Magee. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:40 am
– Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
At a minimum the party to be bound must be shown to have been aware of the Terms and Conditions at the time of purchase: see Kobelt Manufacturing Co v Pacific Rim Engineered Products (1987) Ltd, 2011 BCSC 224 at para 124, 84 BLR (4th) 189. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:59 am
East Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:51 am
Raymours Furniture Co., 436 N.J. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:05 pm
Self-insured employer or union sponsored health plans (Plans), their fiduciaries, third party administrative or other service providers, and sponsors should consult legal counsel for advice about whether their Plans might violate the Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) by disclosing individually identifiable claims or other Plan records or data to a state “all payer” claims or other data base in response to a state law or regulation… [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:49 pm
The Economic Loss Rule and the Ability to Sue Design Professionals without a Contract A recent Maryland case, Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:49 pm
The Economic Loss Rule and the Ability to Sue Design Professionals without a Contract A recent Maryland case, Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. v. [read post]
