Search for: "QUI DOE" Results 61 - 80 of 1,397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2010, 3:57 am by Andres
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 6:05 am
("BNY Mellon") recently got hit with a qui tam whistleblower lawsuit in New York for improperly charging pension funds for foreign exchange transactions. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 10:36 am by Steve Kalar
Held: “We hold that it does not, and we affirm the district court’s order denying intervention. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 10:59 am
What does Rockwell mean for prospective qui tam relators? [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Guido Paola
However, since the content of these amendments does not appear either in the decision of the opposition division or in the minutes of the oral proceedings, the proprietor could not in any way recognize the modifications made to the text of the patent and give his consent.Nowhere in the decision of the opposition decision or minutes of the oral proceedings it is stated that the proprietor consented to the amended text nor did the opposition division ensure that the proprietor agreed with the… [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm by A. Brian Albritton
In addition, while separate dismissals by relators bringing identical actions is uncommon, it does occur on occasion and Defense counsel now have a new case to defend against these serial actions.A. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:07 am by Liskow & Lewis
By Jonathan Hunter: In a highly anticipated decision, the Tenth Circuit held this week that the district court had subject matter jurisdiction over a qui tam action filed by an MMS auditor concerning royalty payments on crude oil produced from offshore federal leases. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:43 am by Jonathan Tycko
While the court’s decision does not describe those “presentations,” presumably they were slideshows or other materials, put together by Boston Scientific’s lawyers, to try to convince the Department of Justice to shut down the investigation or to decline intervention in the lawsuit. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 7:49 pm by LaBovick Law
Legal Blogger, from Getnick & Getnick on QuitamHelp.com, made a valid point in the blog post "Healthways pays $40 million to settle 15 year qui tam suit, when they shared the following statement: "This case “demonstrates the wisdom of Congress in deciding that the government’s decision not to participate does not mean that a case has no merit. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 11:30 am by Anna Christensen
" Because these categories are distinct, Wilson contends, the reference to disclosures by the news media does not undermine the purely federal nature of the second category. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:43 am by Walter Olson
All of higher education does, with no exceptions I’m aware of. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The contention that the Regulatory Exclusion precludes coverage here is not self-evident, and a good case could made that the exclusion does not and was not intended to preclude coverage for this type of claim. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:36 am by The Docket Navigator
"[Plaintiff's] standing to bring a qui tam action under the FCA does not appear to be in serious dispute. . . . [read post]