Search for: "R. v. R."
Results 61 - 80
of 145,080
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
Roosevelt asked William R. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm
The Cyrus R. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
R., 2024 QCCA 645Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), QuébecDécision de : Juges Stephen W. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 11:21 pm
” This, of course, comes in the wake of the decision in R (on the Application of TTT) v Michaela School [2024] EWHC 843 (Admin), on which we published a critical guest post by Russell Sandberg, here. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:44 am
Atkinson, Inc. v Lutin Central Services Co., Inc. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am
Examples of acts which have, in the past, met the actus reus standard for a section 86 offence include: Storing a firearm in a glovebox (see: R v Patrick, 2007 CanLII 7579 (ONSC)) Storing a firearm in a dresser (see: R v McDonald, 2016 BCSC 1648 (CanLII)) Storing a firearm by a furnace (see: R v Roussel, 2014 ABQB 202 (CanLII)) The Guilty Mind (Mens Rea) The mens rea or the guilty mind speaks to the accused’s degree of intent during the… [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am
The court dismisses this request because it regards R. 158 RoP only applicable in main proceedings. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:30 am
John R. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am
Regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 noted that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
Child pornography is addressed under section 163.1 (1) of the Criminal Code of Canada (the “Code”). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:27 am
This was discussed in the case of R v McSween (2020), ONCA 343 (CanLII). [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
Senator Markwayne Mullins (R-OK) used his five minutes of time to tell a story about his wife and her fertility issues. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
R. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
R. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 2:28 pm
R. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am
He covered topics like judicial vacancies, the need for Jordan timelines, and disinformation circulated about the Court’s R v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]
