Search for: "RADIO-ELECTRONICS v. Radio Officers"
Results 61 - 80
of 284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 5:21 am
Roden, supra.The Supreme Court began its analysis of Roden’s arguments by noting that the state Privacy Act, Revised Code of Washington § 9.73.030, provides, in part, that[I]t shall be unlawful for ... the state of Washington, its agencies, and political subdivisions to intercept, or record any:(a) Private communication transmitted by telephone, telegraph, radio, or other device between two or more individuals between points within or without the state by any device… [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 9:00 pm
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:49 am
I stopped going to Radio Shack a few years back, because I’d go in to purchase some $4.00 piece of electronic hardware, and some pimply-faced clerk would insist that the purchase couldn’t be consummated until he’d entered my name and address in his computer. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 7:19 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
When she saw Herrera, she immediately went back into the hotel.Herrera did a positive records check of [Zhuang Miao]and the driver over his patrol radio at approximately 1:15 a.m. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:16 am
Tofasco of America, Inc, Opposition No. 91176670 [Section 2(d) opposition to LIFE STYLING for "portable and handheld digital electronic devices" in view of the registered mark LIFESTYLE for "loudspeaker systems; music systems consisting of a loudspeaker system and power amplifier and at least one of a CD player, tape player and radio tuner; home theatre systems; home entertainment systems; digital circuitry for the afore-mentioned products; and custom design and… [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
Moller Police Officers Aren’t Liable For Investigating Cyberstalking and Revenge Porn–Keaton v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 7:55 am
The Law Offices of Patrick E. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 7:55 am
The Law Offices of Patrick E. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 7:55 am
The Law Offices of Patrick E. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
Patent No. 6,294,953 entitled HIGH SENSITIVITY DEMODULATOR FOR A RADIO TAG AND METHOD and owned by Axcess International. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
Patent No. 6,294,953 entitled HIGH SENSITIVITY DEMODULATOR FOR A RADIO TAG AND METHOD and owned by Axcess International. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 5:28 am
Emboldened by a Ninth Circuit panel's decision to overturn a district court's FTC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 10:01 pm
EsNtion Records, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:36 am
The certification must be signed by an officer of the company under penalty of perjury and can be filed electronically using the FCC’s Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:36 am
See Nava v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:33 am
Radio-Electronics Officers Union, 146 N.J. 140, 156 (1996). [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:28 am
Any electronic device which intentionally emits radio frequency energy must be authorized before it can be marketed within the United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 9:21 am
See: Authors Guild v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
” As simply stated in Seran v. [read post]
