Search for: "RAY PORTER" Results 61 - 67 of 67
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2008, 12:19 pm
- Attorney-mediator Victoria Pynchon at the IP ADR Blog Marketing for law firms - hiring a marketing person and a trend - Legal marketing specialist Tom Kane of Kane Consulting in his Legal Marketing Blog [readers also might want to check out yesterday's LexBlog Q & A with Tom]  Ex-football coach removes lawsuit to federal court, defends post-resignation conduct - Charleston lawyer Jeffrey Mehalic in his West Virginia Business Litigation Blog The hidden costs of… [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 11:49 am
It also brings these posts: Recent case could make Ohio employers more vulnerable to defamation claims - Columbus, Ohio attorney Rob Stalter of Porter Wright Morris & Arthur in the firm's Employer Law Report Collecting prejudgment interest on debts - New Jersey lawyer William H. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 11:56 pm
., Ray LaHood--Illinois, Stephen LaTourette--Ohio, Frank LoBionda--N.J., Frank Lucas--Okla., John McHugh--N.Y., Candice Miller--Mich., Tim Murphy--Penn., Steve Pearce--N.M., John Peterson--Penn., Jon Porter--Nev., Ralph Regula--Ohio, Dennis Rehberg--Montana, David Reichert--Wash., Rick Renzi--Ariz., Thomas Reynolds--N.Y., Jim Saxon--N.J., Christopher Shays--Conn., Mike Simpson--Idaho, Chris Smith--N.J., Mark Souder--Indiana, Michael Turner--Ohio, Greg Walden--Ore., Jerry… [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 12:16 am
An invention is an invention and it should be patented.Colleague Gerard Porter has directed me to a very interesting response to these developments from Arti Rai and James Boyle. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 8:03 am
In my recent podcast with nationally renown expert Attorney Robert Wood, of the Wood & Porter law firm in San Francisco, CA., we discussed the Murphy vs IRS decision on taxable damages, and had touched upon the sexual abuse case issue, not realizing that two days after the podcast the LA Diocese case would make such headlines. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 5:45 am
Ray II to declare unconstitutional the state's program that pays the legal fees of poor death-penalty defendants, because it is inadequately funded. [read post]