Search for: "RENDER V. STATE" Results 61 - 80 of 18,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2015, 10:32 am by Frank Pasquale
[Abigail] Moncrieff’s brief argues the petitioner’s interpretation of the statute would render the statute unconstitutional under two principles of federalism: that Congress can't coerce states into implementing federal programs, and that all states must be treated equally.As Koppelman notes below, the same states' rights ideas at the core of the conservative win in NFIB v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- The Federal Circuit rendered a fractured decision on Friday in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 9:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: This paper argues that the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in FEC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 2:56 pm by The Complex Litigator
Shubb (Eastern District of California) stayed a consumer class action pending against T-Mobile USA, Inc. until a decision is rendered in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:27 am by Shea Denning
Jeff wrote earlier this week about the court of appeals’ opinion in State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:22 am by Rob Robinson
The rendered opinion confirms that companies relying upon SCCs do not need to consider changing their approach at this time. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 1:00 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Food stamps Keisha Harris, appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Cecil County of first degree child abuse, second degree child abuse, rendering a child in need of assistance, and two counts of neglect of a minor, relating to her children A.H. and ... [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 6:04 am by MBettman
The Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in in State of Ohio v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Lord Camden ruled firmly in Entick’s favour, holding that the warrant of a Secretary of State could not render lawful actions such as these which were otherwise unlawful.The case is a canonical statement of the common law’s commitment to the constitutional principle of the rule of law. [read post]