Search for: "RICHARD J CAMPBELL" Results 61 - 80 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
  As some readers may be aware [particularly if they spotted Iona's post on the 1709 Blog, here], the photographer Patrick Cariou brought an action for summary judgment against artist Richard Prince for copyright infringement in 2008 (Cariou v Prince, 784 F. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm by Kevin
Richard Evans of ‘Chop Cut Rebuild’ overcharged for property damage repair. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Amy Starnes
Bunt, Longview Bruce Stuart Campbell, Fort Worth Brian Heath Crockett, Houston Misty Lea Cunningham, Denton Richard William Espey, San Antonio John Blaise Gsanger, Corpus Christi William Wade Hoke, Houston Lannie Todd Kelly, Austin Wade D. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Amy Starnes
Bunt, Longview Bruce Stuart Campbell, Fort Worth Brian Heath Crockett, Houston Misty Lea Cunningham, Denton Richard William Espey, San Antonio John Blaise Gsanger, Corpus Christi William Wade Hoke, Houston Lannie Todd Kelly, Austin Wade D. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
In Hanahoe (much as in Richard v BBC) the Gardaí leaked to the media that they would carry out a search at the offices of a prominent firm of solicitors. [read post]
1 May 2013, 3:17 pm by Nate Persily
Gluck 17        Constitutional Uncertainty and the Design of Social Insurance: Reflections on the ACA Case            Michael J. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
There were a number of reported interim decisions in the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC – due for trial in 2018 (see [2017] EWHC 1291 (Ch); [2017] EWHC 1666 (Ch)). [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 10:05 am
Richard Campbell and Wayne Sturtevant and Circuit Court Judge Judith Proffitt. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:01 am by Joe Consumer
Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Edward J. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal confirmed that the substantive and procedural law that applies to this particular case was clear, and was correctly applied by Lieven J, and they did not consider it necessary to provide any further guidance. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am by Eric Goldman
  The majority opinion in Warhol purports to follow the Campbell frame­work, but instead it reinterprets Campbell in ways that destabilize that three-decade consensus, likely resulting in a decade or more of renewed battle over the contours of the fair-use doctrine. [read post]