Search for: "RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE" Results 61 - 80 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
  Henceforth, Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Loftus, Director, Miami-Dade Police Department (MDPD), along with members of the Federal-State Mortgage Fraud Strike Force. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Loftus, Director, Miami-Dade Police Department (MDPD), along with members of the Federal-State Mortgage Fraud Strike Force. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Peter Margulies
Cancellation recognizes longtime LPRs’ deep ties to the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:07 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
[v] “According to a 2007 interview Klein gave on Colombian TV, his infant firm made $2 million from that deal alone. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am by William McGrath
However, in a May 25, 2012 filing discussed here, the Government stated that "[a]fter consideration of this matter within the United States Attorney’s Office, the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, and the Office of the Solicitor General," it was moving to dismiss the appeal, thereby bringing the case to a close. [read post]