Search for: "RUSHING v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA" Results 61 - 80 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  And just out is Peter Graham Fish’s Federal Justice in the Mid-Atlantic South: United States Courts from Maryland to the Carolinas, 1836–1861 (Carolina Academic Press, 2015). [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  North Carolina seems to be the primary home for these lawsuits, with 200 or so filed a year. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:46 am
Whatever the outcome, North Carolina should not rush to resume executions. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:09 am
North Carolina and Indiana would become deadlocked by an even smaller degree of movement. [read post]
Recently in North Carolina, the state appellate court considered a claim of damages for personal injuries suffered by their daughter at a local chain restaurant, where she consumed a cheesecake that had nuts in it – despite her severe allergy. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 9:34 am by Eugene Volokh
"The dispositive question in this case … is whether content discrimination is reasonably necessary to achieve [North Carolina's] compelling interest[]" in preventing false defamatory speech made with actual malice. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 3:49 pm by Jim Walker
It is a higher per capita rate than California, New York, New Jersey, North Carolina and Georgia (and over a dozen other states). [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
We go with the defending champion and call it for Appalachian State 24-20, whose only loss as defending "Division I national champion" was to the football bowl subdivision team North Carolina State. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina observed, "[i]t would be fundamentally unfair for [a] plaintiff to be able to 'clear his name' and wield a potential judgement against [his accuser] to his advantage but hide under a shield of anonymity if unsuccessful. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:30 pm by Kristen Friend
North Carolina argued that the law was an extension of similar restrictions that prevent sex offenders from being at schools or on playgrounds. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:25 am by aallwash
Witness Jule Sigall, Assistant General Counsel for Copyright Microsoft Corporation, noted the decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:05 am
Both teams have been improving in last weeks and North Carolina is an 8.5 point underdog. [read post]