Search for: "Rafferty v Rafferty"
Results 61 - 80
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm
On 15 December 2011 the Court of Appeal (The Chancellor, Laws and Rafferty LJJ) will give judgment in the case of Berzevoksy v Terluk, (heard 1, 2 and 3 November 2011). [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 17 and 18 October 2011 (Supreme Court) Cambridge v Makin, heard 3 November 2011 (Hughes, Black and Tomlinson LJJ) Berzevoksy v Terluk, heard 1, 2 and 3 November 2011 (The Chancellor, Laws and Rafferty LJJ). [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
The PCC also published the following “resolved” cases on 25 November: Sir Alan Davies Daily Mail, Clause 10; Kenneth Brewster The Sun, Clause 1; Adam Bradford The Star (Sheffield), Clause 1; Karen Coleman Brentwood Gazette, Clause 1; CLEAR The Sun, Clause 1; Mrs Maria Blamires Daily Mail, Clause 5; Mrs Maria Blamires Daily Mirror, Clause 5; Lord Triesman The Mail on Sunday, Clauses 1, 3 and 10; Resolved – London Borough of Sutton v Sutton [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
The trial in the case of El-Naschie v Macmillan finally began on 11 November 2011. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
The Court of Appeal (Chancellor, Laws and Rafferty LJJ) heard the appeal in Berezovksy v Terluk over three days, 1, 2 and 3 November 2011. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am
On Tuesday 1 November 2011 the Court of Appeal (Chancellor, Laws and Rafferty LJJ) will hear the appeal in Berezovksy v Terluk. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 3:13 am
C.B.D. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
Following Mid Bedfordshire District Council v Brown [2004] EWCA Civ 1709, South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell [2005] EWCA Civ 1429 and Wychavon District Council v Rafferty [2006] EWCA Civ 628, however, on committal applications and applications to vary injunctions which were being breached, "maintaining the authority of court orders is an o [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
Following Mid Bedfordshire District Council v Brown [2004] EWCA Civ 1709, South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell [2005] EWCA Civ 1429 and Wychavon District Council v Rafferty [2006] EWCA Civ 628, however, on committal applications and applications to vary injunctions which were being breached, "maintaining the authority of court orders is an o [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
http://tinyurl.com/4avwrhj (Stephen Arnold) Judge Scheindlin Rules That Metadata is Integral Part of ESI, Admonishes Counsel for Failing to Meet and Confer Concerning Form of ESI Production - http://tinyurl.com/4ul9xmm (Jennifer Hradil) Gavel to Gavel: Pitfalls of Monitoring Social Media - http://tinyurl.com/6j3o8uz (Byrona Maule) Government Appeals and Seeks a Stay of Judge Scheindlin’s FOIA Order on Metadata in NDLON v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:25 pm
Western Delta Lands, 2003 BCCA 180; Rafferty v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
Mrs Justice Rafferty noted the Croatian cases, and the observation of Cranston J in Coombes v Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 Admin that There is an obvious conflict between the Strasbourg jurisprudence and our own However, following Husband v Solihull MBC [2009] EWHC 3673 (Admin) and Wandsworth LBC v Dixon [2009] EWHC 27 [links to our reports], Qazi was held to be solid precdent that the rule in Monk was compatible with Art 8. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
Mrs Justice Rafferty noted the Croatian cases, and the observation of Cranston J in Coombes v Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 Admin that There is an obvious conflict between the Strasbourg jurisprudence and our own However, following Husband v Solihull MBC [2009] EWHC 3673 (Admin) and Wandsworth LBC v Dixon [2009] EWHC 27 [links to our reports], Qazi was held to be solid precdent that the rule in Monk was compatible with Art 8. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
Co. v Rafferty, 17 AD3d 888, 889 [2005]). [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am
We note that, although there has not been a jury trial in a libel case for nearly a year, a civil jury trial is commencing on the Royal Courts of Justice on Monday 21 June 2010 before Mrs Justice Rafferty. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:00 am
Massey, 686 S.W.2d 60 (Tenn. 1984); Rafferty v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:18 pm
v=Sk6veSZfLJE(c) Legal Expert Connections, Inc., 866-417-7025 www.legalexpertconnections.com [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
The Colorado Supreme Court ruling in "People of the State of Colorado v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:12 am
QR attorneys Brian Patrick Bronson and Michael V. [read post]
