Search for: "Rather v. City & County of San Francisco"
Results 61 - 80
of 192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2019, 3:47 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 227 Cal.App.4th 1036, 1054 (2014). [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
City of San Diego, S238563. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:47 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2018) 22 Cal.App.5th 77, 85, fn. omitted, quoting Gov. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:23 pm
City & County of San Francisco, (2019) ___ Cal.App. 5th ____ In 2014, real parties Forest City California Residential Development and Hearst Communications, Inc. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:29 pm
City & County of San Francisco, (2019) ___ Cal.App. 5th ____. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
The Supreme Court took a case raising a similar question in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am
City and County of San Francisco (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 656, 695.) [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 12:58 pm
City & County of San Francisco, No. 16-16072 (9th Cir. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
City of San Diego, S238563. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
The new VMT methodology will not be mandatory until July 1, 2020, unless implemented early by a lead agency, as has been done by the City of San Francisco. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
As the Maine law explains, under a Ranked-Choice voting regime (a version of which has been used in some local jurisdictions, such as San Francisco County, for years), “the method of casting and tabulating votes [is one] in which voters rank candidates in order of preference, [and then] tabulation proceeds in sequential rounds in which last-place candidates are defeated and the candidate with the most votes in the final round is elected. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
County of San Diego (September 28, 2018, case no. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:37 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2018) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:14 am
Protect Niles v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
LandWatch San Luis Obispo County v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:21 pm
City & County of San Francisco (9th Cir. 2014). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:40 pm
PG&E owns and operates the Diablo Canyon plant, a two-unit nuclear power plant on 750-acres of land also owned by PG&E near Avila Beach in San Luis Obispo County. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:32 am
The case is being litigated on behalf of the People by the County of Santa Clara, the City and County of San Francisco, the County of Alameda, the City of Oakland, the City of San Diego, the County of Los Angeles, the County of Monterey, the County of San Mateo, the County of Solano, and the County of Ventura. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2002) 27 Cal.4th 643, 663-671; Santa Monica Beach, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm
Berkeley City Council (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 768, 776; Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
