Search for: "Redding v. Christian" Results 61 - 80 of 346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
 Anyway, Core Issues v Transport for London explains everything -- and here it is.Core Issues (CI) was a Christian organisation which was formed with the objective of supporting homosexuals "who voluntarily seek a change in sexual preference and expression", a.k.a. sexual re-orientation. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 10:01 pm
  One guess is that in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:26 am
Named plaintiff Pamela Stella alleges that she purchased Christian Dior "Addict Positive Red" lipstick, manufactured by LVMH Perfumes and Cosmetics USA Inc., at a Nordstrom department store in June, 2007. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:20 am
The case reference is Christian Louboutin and Christian Louboutin SAS v Van Haren Schoenen BV, C-163/16.More specifically, the Dutch court is asking the CJEU to answer this question:“Is the notion of ‘shape’ within the meaning of Article 3(1)(e)(iii) of Directive C (‘Form’, ‘vorm’ and ‘forme’ in the German, Dutch and French language versions of the Trade Marks Directive respectively) limited to the… [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Redding, A Secular Failure: Sectarianism and Communalism in Shayara Bano v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:07 am by Sheppard Mullin
On August 10, 2011, Judge Victor Marrero denied Christian Louboutin S.A.'s motion for a preliminary injunction to enforce its U.S. trademark (Registration No. 3,361,597) for "lacquered red soles on footwear" covering "Women's High Fashion Designer Footwear" in International Class 25. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:42 pm
Yves Saint Laurent finds friends in 11 law professors in Louboutin red sole battle Five days ago a group of 11 law professors all from different universities filed an amicus curiae brief in support of Yves Saint Laurent in their defence against Christian Louboutin's trade mark infringement claim (see previous stories here and here) in respect of their red soles. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:12 am by Eric Goldman
Summit Entertainment * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:44 am by Sheppard Mullin
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:11 am by Eric Goldman
Summit Entertainment * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 10:08 am
"  It seems that Donatella Versace has taken roughly the same attitude toward Christian Louboutin's recent registration of his signature red soles as a U.S. trademark. [read post]