Search for: "Regional Acceptance Corp. v. Powers" Results 61 - 80 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
General Motors Corp., 463 F.2d 98, 100 (2d Cir. 1972) (“bare bones statement. . .without any supporting facts permits dismissal”); Jackson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
As Chairman Schapiro explained the change, “in investigations that require subpoena power, time is always of the essence. [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
  It was thus not surprising to see the reaction of European elites when an imperial order (not the United States) would presume to assert the sort of sovereign prerogatives that the EU assumed was beyond its power.3. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
Women, who comprise 51% of the population, own 4.97% of television stations, and minorities, who comprise of 33% of the population, own 3.26% of all stations. [27] In addition, media diversity is believed to be an important check on government power. [28] IV. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 7:47 am by Sam Cohen, Steve Floyd
Japan criticized China for continuing to reject the ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
"On a CPLR 3211 motion to dismiss, the court will accept the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, accord plaintiffs the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory" (Nonnon v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
., will pay a $15,000 civil penalty and spend at least $45,000 on a supplemental project to help clean local high school laboratories of hazardous waste, as part of a settlement with EPA Region 7 over hazardous waste management issues at the university’s Danforth and School of Medicine campuses. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Gender: Three groups attend these meetings—Geneva diplomatic corps; government officials; experts. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:15 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Many observers trace the more vigorous enforcement of Canada’s competition laws to 2009 amendments giving the Bureau enhanced information-gathering powers and longer periods of time to investigate mergers, and greater penalties for anti-competitive conduct. [read post]