Search for: "Resnick v. Resnick" Results 61 - 80 of 251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2018, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Andrew’s affidavit was sufficient to raise a question of fact as to whether the defendant engaged in a course of continuous representation intended to rectify or mitigate the initial act of alleged malpractice (see Melnick v Farrell, 128 AD3d 1371, 1372 [2015]; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 812-813 [2011]; Gravel v Cicola, 297 AD2d 620, 621 [2002]). [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Lunch SESSION V: IDENTIFYING GAPS IN THE EVIDENTIARY BASESession Objectives:• Highlight evidentiary gaps that, if filled, would help inform potential approaches for health care providers. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Catherine Padhi
But in the closest case on point, Resnick v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am by Victoria Kwan
Supreme Court justices’ speaking engagements typically make headlines for what happens inside, not outside, the venue. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Daniel Coles
Later this year the Supreme Court of Canada is scheduled to hear the appeal of R. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 3:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Other federal appellate courts that have reached a similar conclusion include the Third Circuit’s January 2017 decision in the Horizon Healthcare Services data breach litigation (here) and the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Resnick v. [read post]