Search for: "Richard A Garrett"
Results 61 - 80
of 264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2018, 5:10 am
" As I mentioned last July, Venkat Balasubramani and Garrett Heilman (Focal Law LLC) and I filed a federal lawsuit challenging this statute. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 1:11 pm
He was identified as Richard Joseph Engel, a 71-year-old resident of Shingletown. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:16 am
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps considers Kavanaugh’s “sole opinion on the issue of choice, a 2017 dissent in Garza v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm
Below the fold are the results of the 2018-2019 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
” Briefly: At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps marks the 150th anniversary of the 14th Amendment by reviewing the history around its ratification. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:59 pm
Other early coverage comes from Richard Wolf of USA Today, Michael D. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
RICHARD T. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:38 pm
Richard H. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
” Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Richard Wolf at USA Today and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 5:24 am
“Sonia Sotomayor’s Dissent in the Big Voter-Purge Case Points to How the Law Might Still Be Struck Down”: Law professor Richard L. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
” Additional commentary comes from Garrett Epps at The Atlantic, Dahlia Lithwick at Slate, Daniel Nichanian in an analysis for NBC News, Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, here and here, Lisa Soronen at the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, and Richard Hasen at Slate, who suggests that “Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s lone dissent provides two paths forward to mount new attacks on these voter-suppression laws based on their discriminatory impact. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
” Additional coverage comes from Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, Richard Wolf for USA Today, Josh Gerstein and Renuka Rayasam at Politico, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, and Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, who reports that the court “declined to take up the administration’s request for disciplinary action against the American Civil Liberties Union lawyers who represented the girl,” and “allowed litigation to continue in lower courts concerning other detained… [read post]
27 May 2018, 8:46 pm
IAM North America editor Richard Lloyd will moderate a roundtable discussion of attorneys from Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt; Knobbe Martens; and Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner to discuss the implications of the Supreme Court's decision in decisions in Oil States v Greene's Energy and SAS Institute v Iancu and how they will affect the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), inter partes review petitioners, and patent owners. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
Richard Re has this blog’s argument analysis. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:26 am
For The National Law Journal, Tony Mauro interviews Richard Hasen about Hasen’s “controversial book on [Justice Antonin] Scalia, ‘The Justice of Contradictions,’ … [which] takes a broad view of what [Hasen] sees as the inconsistencies in Scalia’s decision-making. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:35 am
Brandon Garrett found that of the 330 cases of convicts exonerated by DNA evidence, 24% involved informant testimony. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes imagines a scenario in which “Justice Kennedy could still be line to write the lead opinion in Gill [v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 9:53 am
Chain | Cohn | Stiles attorney Matt Clark discussed Youngblood’s comments recently while on The Richard Beene Show on KERN Radio 1180, 96.1. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
Commentary comes from Jessica Levinson at NBC News and Garrett Epps at The Atlantic, who observes that “[t]he background to this case is the simple fact that states ‘compel’ all kinds of professional, commercial, and medical speech to prevent misinformation, [a]nd speech to pregnant women about abortion may be the most regulated single kind of speech in America. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that “[a] responsible course—as even Solicitor General Francisco seemed to admit—would be to remand the case for the creation of a factual record to supplant some of the airy theorizing the advocates (and the justices) engaged in. [read post]
