Search for: "Richards v. Richards & Richards" Results 61 - 80 of 13,539
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
On 5 April 2024 Deputy High Court Judge Richard Spearman KC made an order rejecting all applications made by controversial YouTuber Adil Raja and found that Raja had published statements which were seriously defamatory of Rashid Naseer in nine publications on the social media sites YouTube, Facebook and X (formerly Twitter). [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am by Frank Cranmer
The ECtHR Declines to Intervene on Religious Slaughter: on Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v Belgium [2024] ECHR 137, which we noted here. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm by Hugh Rennie
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:19 am by David Pocklington
The decision of Joanna Smith J. in Frain & McKinnon v Reeves & Curnock [2023] EWHC 73 (Ch) (at 19), was cited with approval, from which the following relevant principles could be distilled: a. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
The paper won the 2021 George and Ann Richards Prize for the best article published in the journal that year. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:06 am by Steven Cohen
   The defendants subsequently hired Biomedical Expert Witness Richard C. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:01 am by Richard Worsfold
Justice Dietrich noted the principles that she had set out in Henderson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" The platforms challenged the law on First Amendment grounds in NetChoice v. [read post]