Search for: "Richter v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 172
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
United States 13-632Issue: Whether forensic pathology reports are testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:02 am by Dylan Ballard
  But the fact that certain activities might have taken place in the United States is irrelevant if the economic consequences are not felt in the United States economy. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
Bridges 13-657Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution allows States to tax goods distributed by out-of-state wholesalers more heavily than goods distributed by in-state wholesalers. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm by Jeff Gamso
  But Kozinski was dissenting in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
  For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19]  Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations and sixty-one… [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm by Bill Marler
  For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19]  Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations and sixty-one… [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
Richter, a federal court may not look behind a state court’s assertion that a summary disposition is a decision on the merits. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by John Elwood
United States, and perhaps implicating the twice-relisted Woodward v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-10638, is now most likely on hold for Robers; ditto Quince v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am by John Elwood
Sims 12-1217Issue: (1) Whether the “hot pursuit” doctrine articulated in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am by Mary Dwyer
Sims 12-1217Issue: (1) Whether the “hot pursuit” doctrine articulated in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]