Search for: "Ring v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 919
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2022, 6:00 am
That process has begun with new litigation in the post-Roe period bringing these conflicts into sharper focus, including a fight over who ultimately controls the doctors and health providers in the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 6:04 am
In A.P. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:21 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:17 pm
It is a known feat of the Mexican Government to redraw borders and extract the wealth from the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
In his concurrence to Webster v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:01 am
ShareThe justices took the easy and simple path in Siegel v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am
State Department spokesperson Ned Price said yesterday. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
What is more, the Leegin Court made clear that administrative convenience—part of the justification for administrative rules[30]—cannot in and of itself be sufficient to justify application of the per se rule.[31] The Court’s warnings about per se rules ring just as true for rules that could be promulgated under the Commission’s purported UMC rulemaking authority, which would function just as a per se rule would. [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am
In LF v SCRL [2022] EUECJ C‑344/20 (Opinion), Advocate General Medina suggests at [60] that “Article 8 of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as permitting Member States to adopt … autonomous protection as a means legitimately to determine, first, whether employees concerned by religious clothing obligations should not be placed, as a matter of principle, in a situation where they might need to choose between observing the obligations deriving… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
The Court seemed to hold that in 1962, when it ruled in Engel v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 2:51 pm
Judge Jackson’s fine work, her love of the United States, her balanced and principled decision making should resonate with all races. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 11:26 pm
United States, which concluded that Miranda is "a constitutional decision of this Court [that] may not be in effect overruled by an Act of Congress. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
The United States won the battle. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:40 pm
On Monday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down its Continental v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on the International Relations Entering a New Era and the Global Sustainable Development February 4, 2022 At the invitation of President of the People’s Republic of China Xi Jinping, President of the Russian Federation Vladimir V. [read post]
