Search for: "Robert Clinton v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Roberts jumps in again. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:04 pm
A very similar case is pending before a three-judge-panel in Georgia – Georgia State Conf. of the NAACP v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Roberts’s invocation of stare decisis per Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
[United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
As Justice Scalia noted in his dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In the 1964 case of Bouie v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
Maryland, as well as to United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am
City of Miami and Wells Fargo & Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 9:10 pm
Who voted in the five-justice majority in this U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am
[The walls are closing on universal, non-party injunctions against state laws. ] Labrador v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court had a similar political split based on the party of the president who appointed them with Chief Justice John Roberts (Bush) and Associate Justices Anthony Kennedy (Reagan), Clarence Thomas (Bush I) and Samuel Alito (Bush II) on one side with Associate Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Clinton), Stephen Breyer (Clinton), Sonia Sotomayor (Obama), and Elena Kagan (Obama) on the other. [read post]
9 May 2007, 11:48 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Clinton Hawkins v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:16 am
” In an op-ed in the Denver Post, Joseph Smith Jr. weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 3:00 pm
Federal Trade Commission, and Saenz v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
Written in the aftermath of Bush v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:20 am
This article is part of a SCOTUSblog symposium on the Roberts court and the religion clauses. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:36 pm
(Judge Michael Genden retiring).Circuit Group 66 - Incumbent Robert Luck v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 6:13 am
Baker III, the secretary of state under President George Bush, and Robert M. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:58 pm
As the first substantive day of the impeachment trial wore on, and on, from yesterday into the early morning hours of today, one cable-TV pundit suggested that Chief Justice John Roberts might not feel compelled to attend today’s oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
