Search for: "Robert Coyle" Results 61 - 80 of 366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2020, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Josh Blackman predicts the authors of most of the Supreme Court’s remaining decisions this term, assigning the lion’s share of the major cases to Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
At The National Law Journal, Marcia Coyle asks veteran Supreme Court advocates” for their assessment of the arguments—the pros and cons, and everything in between. [read post]
12 May 2020, 10:11 am by Marcia Coyle
Switch now to Colorado where Micheal Baca, Polly Baca, and Robert Nemanich were three of nine Democratic electors. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
At Constitution Daily, Marcia Coyle reports that this case and with one scheduled for argument tomorrow “are sequels to earlier cases that [the Supreme Court] decided[:] In the middle of a pandemic which is triggering new legal and constitutional questions, … the culture wars go on and on. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall report that “if other courts’ experiences are any guide, the new format could stray from the crisp hourlong sessions that Chief Justice Roberts strives to run. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:17 am by Marcia Coyle
The Roberts Supreme Court has been a very strong First Amendment free speech court. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 12:47 pm by Marcia Coyle
Marcia Coyle is a regular contributor to Constitution Daily and the Chief Washington Correspondent for The National Law Journal, covering the Supreme Court for more than 20 years. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” At The National Law Journal, Marcia Coyle reports that “[a] rare confession of error by the U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:31 am by Marcia Coyle
" Marcia Coyle is a regular contributor to Constitution Daily and the Chief Washington Correspondent for The National Law Journal, covering the Supreme Court for more than 20 years. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” Marcia Coyle reports for The National Law Journal that “[i]t’s rare that the justices are asked to address issues that come up after arguments,” but “[t]he letter from the DACA lawyers is not the first time that new events have made their way to the justices’ attention in a pending case. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
Roberts Jr. and Justice Brett M. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post (subscription required) that “[i]t’s hard to overstate what a decision about this law … will reveal about this Supreme Court and its jurisprudence on what remains one of the nation’s most politically divisive topics. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm by Mark Walsh
Marcia Coyle reported in The National Law Journal earlier this week that Mrs. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:47 am by Kalvis Golde
At the National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Marcia Coyle reports that two cases pending at the Supreme Court ask “the justices to extend the reach of their landmark 2018 First Amendment ruling” in Janus v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
Of the making of lists of books, there shall be no end. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At PBS, Marcia Coyle reviews the first half of the Supreme Court term and previews the second, noting that “[i]n addition to the Senate trial, over which Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. is expected to preside, the ongoing presidential election campaign and a docket chock full of politically controversial cases have brewed a fraught environment for justices who want the public to believe the high court stands apart from politics. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: For The National Law Journal, Marcia Coyle reports that “[d]espite putting a temporary hold Monday on a decision approving a U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
 At The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Marcia Coyle reports that “Clement has argued broadly for business community interests at the Supreme Court, and his defense of the consumer bureau would put him at odds—at least in this case—with groups such as the U.S. [read post]