Search for: "Robert Edward Davis v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
In addition, defendant and his lawyer, Robert Gottlieb, each submitted an affidavit in support of the motion. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
(That count also includes current members of the Court such as John Roberts, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor, though the latter has recently signed a contract to write a book.) [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm by Pace Law School Library
  State regulation of air pollution fromoffshore ships is upheld in PacificMerchant Shipping Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by GuestPost
We cannot accept the death of another Troy Davis or Edward Earl Johnson. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:26 am
DickensonDirectors’ Liability: The Case of Directorial Responsibility Following Roberts v Frohlich by Francis Mackie, Rhys Davies and Alexandra TownsleyNew Jersey and Indiana Join New York and Florida in Relaxing Credit for Reinsurance Collateral Requirements  by Nick R. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]