Search for: "Robert H. Wells v. State of Florida" Results 61 - 80 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2015, 7:09 pm by Jon Gelman
The NCCI publishes state and countrywide data on adjustments in premium level due to several factors, including benefit change, which “refers to adjustments in premium level to account for benefit changes adopted by the various state legislatures, as well as medical fee and hospital rate changes (NCCI 2014, Exhibit 1). [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 5:00 am by Neil H. Buchanan
Is the United States still, as I recently put it, a “Dead Democracy Walking”? [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
In other Court action, forty-eight states and the District of Columbia filed an amicus brief in Snyder v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  As a jurisprudential principle, the presumption against health law preemptions depends then on the accuracy of historical characterizations, as well as a malleable notion of regulatory “tradition” in health and safety. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
(Domestic Relations Law § 76–f [2][a]-[h] ). [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 3:43 am by Rory Little
Stokeling and the categorical evaluation of Florida’s robbery statute The first argument of the day, in Stokeling v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Florida and New Hampshire, two states with no individual income tax, are consistently the top destinations for net outmigration of AGI from Massachusetts. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
The only example Koppelman cites for originalism having influenced a case outcome the Natelson-Kopel influence on Chief Justice Roberts' opinion in the Obamacare case, National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
The Turtles ongoing tri-state litigation against SiriusXM over the satellite radio broadcaster's refusal to pay to broadcast pre-1972 sound recordings reached the the Florida Supreme Court, who looked again at Judge Darrin Gayle's decision which found in favour of SiriusXM and agreed that "There is no specific Florida legislation covering sound recording property rights, nor is there a bevy of case law interpreting common law copyright related to the… [read post]