Search for: "Robert J. Mitchell" Results 61 - 80 of 306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2021, 6:04 am
Jackson Jr., (discussed on the Forum here); and The Untenable Case for Keeping Investors in the Dark by Lucian Bebchuk, Robert J. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Mitchell, The Unholy Marriage that Spawned America's Social Justice Warriors, (January 25, 2021).Tory L. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
Gerhardt, The Power of Precedent (Oxford 2008) Robert Bennett & Lawrence Solum, Constitutional Originalism (Cornell 2011) Gary L McDowell, The Language of Law & the Foundations of American Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2010) Eric Segall, Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges (Praeger 2012) Michael Greve, The Upside-Down Constitution (Harvard 2012) Alexander Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (NYU 2004) 2011: H. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Here is the breakdown of the votes: KAVANAUGH, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Mozilla CEO Mitchell Baker has stated that the countries lack of data protection laws have “increased the harm faced by ordinary Indians”. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The former Fairfax newspapers claim they have found four new eyewitnesses to the alleged murder of an Afghan villager by Australian special forces, which they hope will bolster their defence against a defamation claim brought by the decorated soldier Ben Roberts-Smith. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm by Josh Blackman
[Further thoughts on the Tucker Act and Federal Question Jurisdiction] Last week I posed a question: "can a plaintiff seek compensation for an unconstitutional taking, without relying on the Tucker Act's jurisdiction–if not under the Takings Clause, perhaps under some theory of tort. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:02 pm by Josh Blackman
I've created a diagram to explain Part III of Chief Justice Roberts's controlling opinion. [read post]