Search for: "Robert S Kant"
Results 61 - 80
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2012, 10:05 pm
We have some inkling what John Roberts thinks of the matter. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:10 am
I don't think he's actually saying that, although he suggests it by tired references to Chief Roberts' views about Bulgaria and Kant. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:01 am
We have some inkling what John Roberts thinks of the matter. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:37 am
" In the bulk of the review, I focus on what I take to be some of the book's most innovative contributions: his use of Locke, his use of Kant instead of Hegel, and his focus on mid-level principles. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:38 am
For me, these cases brought to mind Chief Justice Roberts' famous mockery of the contribution of scholars to actual law: “Pick up a copy of any law review that you see, and the first article is likely to be, you know, the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in eighteenth-century Bulgaria, or something. . . . [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:51 am
In the Supreme Court's recent 5-4 decisions in Lafler v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:00 pm
Robert Paul Wolff has begun a multipart tutorial on Kant's Ethical Theory at The Philosopher's Stone. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm
Or Kant is sent to woodshed once someone can't explain why we can’t explain why we can’t like to Nazis asking where our friends are hiding. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:14 pm
Much of the plausibility and appeal of liberalism is in the nuanced versions put forward by thinkers far removed from Immanuel Kant, Mill, and even John Rawls. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:32 pm
Discussion Three Comments on Joseph Raz’s Conception of Normativity IntroductionGeorge Pavlakos Raz’s NexusNiko Kolodny Guided by Reasons: Raz on the Normative-Explanatory NexusUlrike Heuer Problems of Intellectualism: Raz on Reason and its ObjectsDouglas Lavin Reviews Five reviews of Rae Langton, Sexual Solipsism: Philosophical Essays on Pornography and Objectification, with a response from Rae Langton Subordination, Silencing, and Two Ideas of … [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:22 am
Robert Merges, Justifying Intellectual Property. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 11:50 am
that tried to put Kant's dictum into practice. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
Maybe it's because law professors actually have the time to document how radically Roberts and his allies have diverged from precedent? [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:40 am
Maybe it’s because law professors actually have the time to document how radically Roberts and his allies have diverged from precedent? [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm
Some people — for example, Chief Justice John Roberts — are not fans of contemporary legal scholarship. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:24 am
Info: Title:Justifying Intellectual Property Author: Robert P. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 10:14 am
All of the great moral and political philosopher, from Plato and Aristotle, through Hobbes, Hume, Kant, Bentham, and Mill, to contemporary figures like Thomas Scanlon and Derek Parfit have engaged in debates about the nature of the human good. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:21 am
’s position). [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:05 pm
It’s not exactly news, but it’s something people have been talking about this summer, after Chief Justice Roberts disparaged the usefulness of legal scholarship at this year’s Fourth Circuit Judicial Conference. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:30 am
Robert Merges: how do you find members of the user community who can speak for the group? [read post]
